Prediction of Mel Purcell vs Eddie Dibbs Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Purcell vs E. Dibbs

Mel Purcell

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Eddie Dibbs

USA

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Purcell 2 - 0 Dibbs

They have played 7 sets in total, with Mel Purcell winning 5 and Eddie Dibbs winning 2. The last match between Mel Purcell and Eddie Dibbs was at the Roland Garros, 25-05-1981, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Mel Purcell getting the victory 3-6 2-6 6-4 6-2 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Purcell	2
Dibbs	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R3) Roland Garros(05-25-81)

Stats

Mel Purcell

Eddie Dibbs

(R3) Washington(07-21-80)

Stats

Mel Purcell

Eddie Dibbs

M. Purcell vs E. Dibbs H2H Profile

M. Purcell	Stats	E. Dibbs
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
54.16% (202-171)	Career Total W/L	69.64% (608-265)
2	Clay	0
3	Titles	22
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Purcell vs E. Dibbs Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mel Purcell has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Eddie Dibbs has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mel Purcell, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Eddie Dibbs has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mel Purcell has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eddie Dibbs has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mel Purcell has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Eddie Dibbs winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mel Purcell has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 97/70), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 47% (W/L 8/9). Eddie Dibbs has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 373/132), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 6/6).
Player level: In the last year, Mel Purcell has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Eddie Dibbs has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mel Purcell winning 2 times and Eddie Dibbs being victorious 0 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Mel Purcell winning 5 and Eddie Dibbs winning 2.
The last match between Mel Purcell and Eddie Dibbs was at the Roland Garros, 25-05-1981, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Mel Purcell getting the victory 3-6 2-6 6-4 6-2 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mel Purcell has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Eddie Dibbs has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mel Purcell has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eddie Dibbs has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mel Purcell has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eddie Dibbs has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mel Purcell vs Eddie Dibbs Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Purcell vs E. Dibbs H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Purcell	Stats	E. Dibbs
2	H2H Matches Won	0
5	Sets Won	2
36	Games Won	28
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Purcell Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Hanko CH - 17-07-1989
R3 Ronnie BathmanR. Bathman	W	6-3 7-6	Stats
R4 Renzo FurlanR. Furlan	W	6-3 6-3	Stats
QF Nicklas UtgrenN. Utgren	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Tampere CH - 10-07-1989
R3 Andres VysandA. Vysand	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Raleigh CH - 15-05-1989
R3 Jimmy BrownJ. Brown	L	6-0 6-2	Stats

View All

E. Dibbs Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Washington - 23-07-1984
R2 Hans GildemeisterH. Gildemeister	L	3-6 7-5 6-2	Stats
Boston - 16-07-1984
R2 Jimmy BrownJ. Brown	L	6-3 5-7 6-2	Stats
Rome - 13-05-1984
R2 Colin DowdeswellC. Dowdeswell	W	6-2 6-0	Stats
R3 Anders JarrydA. Jarryd	L	6-3 6-0	Stats
Forest Hills WCT - 06-05-1984
R2 Ben TestermanB. Testerman	L	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

M. Purcell vs E. Dibbs Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Purcell	Stats	E. Dibbs
54.16% (202/171)	YTD Win/Loss	69.64% (608/265)
53.43% (499/435)	Sets Win/Loss	64.60% (1352/741)
51.50% (4380/4125)	Games Win/Loss	55.59% (10762/8599)
55.97% (75/59)	Hard Win/Loss	68.18% (105/49)
58.08% (97/70)	Clay Win/Loss	73.86% (373/132)
40.00% (22/33)	Indoor Hard W/L	61.70% (116/72)
47.06% (8/9)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (6/6)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
491.19	Average Opponent Rank	576.59
56.00% (28/22)	Slam W/L	71.43% (45/18)
45.45% (10/12)	Masters W/L	70.67% (53/22)
53.90% (152/130)	Main Tour W/L	69.39% (510/225)
63.16% (12/7)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
54% (170/315)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	71% (545/773)
54% (31/57)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	63% (55/88)
0% (0/1)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	56% (20/36)
50% (54/109)	Deciding Set Win %	65% (154/238)
84% (202/170)	1st Set Won, Won Match	92% (552/510)
16% (202/32)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	7% (552/40)
19% (171/32)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	29% (312/90)